Carbon 14 or 16 dating eastern euopean girls dating america men
Carbon-14 dating relies on the following assumptions: It is known that the radiocarbon content of the atmosphere has varied in the past, so the initial activity of carbon-14 has NOT been a constant.
The following variations in carbon-14 activity have been noted: Calibration curves have been produced by comparing radiocarbon dates with other dating methods such as dendrochronology (a dating method using the tree's growth rings).
Dating with C is possible for up to “50 to 80 thousand years” before the present, yet we need to remember that these older dates are under the assumption that there never was any worldwide flood.
We generally refer to those numbers as “carbon-14 dates.” Consider now how the C dating method has been used on dinosaur remains.
But that approach to a new discovery is far from what I would call an act of science.
Comment on a Theologyweb Forum Carbon-14 dating can only extend back to roughly 50,000 years.
In that case, we really can “triumphantly” declare that the ball weighs only a few ounces.
Carbon-14 can not be used to measure the age of very young specimens as the difference between the amount of carbon-12 and carbon-14 will not be sufficient to be detected.
From Site “Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones are less than 40,000 years old” Members of the Paleochronology group presented their findings at the 2012 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting in Singapore, August 13-17, a conference of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS).
Sad to report: Because so many paleontologists have so long assumed that all dinosaurs became extinct many million years old, the abstract of the report by the Paleochronology group was censured, deleted from the conference website because they did not like to consider such an apparently revolutionary discovery.
C) dating has traditionally been done with assumptions outside the Biblical framework, namely this: Interpretations have been without any consideration for the possibility that the Flood of Genesis was an actual event.
When we consider the worldwide flood of the Old Testament as part of actual history, the raw data will be seen to be highly inflated for the ages of living things further back in time.